![Welcome to Plbg.com](/images/plbg-forum-logo.png)
![Thank you to all the plumbing professionals who offer their advice and expertise](/images/plbg-thankyou-banner2.png)
Over 700,000 strictly plumbing related posts
Welcome to Plbg.com (also known as PlumbingForum.com) where plumbing advice, education, information, help and suggestions are provided by some of the most experienced plumbers and plumbing contractors anywhere who all wish to "give back" to society. Since 1996 we have been free without popup or other invasive ads and known to be the best online STRICTLY PLUMBING advice site. If you have questions about plumbing, toilets, sinks, faucets, drains, sewers, water filters, venting, water heating, showers, pumps, and other strictly PLUMBING related issues then you've come to the right place. Please refrain from asking or discussing legal questions, or pricing, or where to find and/or purchase products, or any business issues, or for contractor referrals, or any other questions or issues not specifically related to plumbing. Keep all posts positive and absolutely no advertising. Our site is completely free, without ads or pop-ups and we don't track you. We absolutely do not sell your personal information. We are made possible by:
Author:
Lex (CA)
Hi all! Have a question about connecting a new shower drain and p-trap(2" ABS)to cast iron under slab. Specifically, what coupling would be appropriate buried underground in this scenario. I cut behind the bell end on the old cast iron horizontal pipe, removing the old cast iron p-trap. Coupling will join the existing horizontal cast iron drain pipe to 2" ABS DWV pipe. My choices are un-shielded couplings (like typical rubber fernco type with 2 bands at ends of coupling) vs a no-hub stainless full shielded coupling. This coupling will be buried below the slab in the bathroom under the shower. So, underground within footprint of house. Which style coupling is correct for this installation? Is a shielded no-hub coupling the way to go?
I posted a pic of a few styles of couplings... from standard Fernco to heavy duty No-Hub shielded.
Also posted is a pic of what I put together with a standard Fernco coupling joining the cast iron to the new 2" ABS.
I just used a standard Fernco in this pic to illustrate the connection I need to make. Nothing is glued up or assembled yet.
![](https://www.thegearpage.net/board/index.php?media/couplings-png.443561/full)
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
sum (FL)
I think the shielded coupling, heavy duty or not, is a neoprene sleeve like a Fernco Proflex, which is not rated for buried applications.
The rubber coupling to the right is the same as the strong back 1056-22RC, except the strong back has an additional shear ring in the middle for extra reinforcement. The stear ring can be ordered separately. Both can be used underground and buried. I personally prefer the strong back version.
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
Lex (CA)
Thanks! Yes, I did see that the Fernco Proflex is listed as above ground only. I thought the Fernco MD and HD no-hub couplings were rated underground use... but I am looking at the specs and find no mention. Weird. They seem to be full stainless rings and shield.
As you say, the Fernco Strong Back 1056-22RC is listed as underground approval. I have one coming in the mail tomorrow.
Was just wondering if those burly fully shielded stainless no-hub couplings with four straps and the special shield were better connectors for this application. I am kinda confused here. I was reading that some people were against using a regular fernco buried, instead saying that a shielded no-hub was the right connection underground.
So are shielded no-hub couplings only for above ground use to resist shear forces?
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
sum (FL)
I am not a pro just a very active DIYer so may be a pro will weigh in with better info.
I have used the Fernco PROFLEX in above ground applications and the other two for underground applications several times. Since PROFLEX is limited to above ground applications according to Fernco's web site, I concluded (perhaps incorrectly) that all coupling with a thin neoprene sleeve, whether reinforced by two or four SS straps and whether torqued to 60#in or 80#in are for above ground applications. To me the basic difference is one is using a thinner neoprene sleeve and the other two are using much thicker rubber sleeves.
Also bear in mind, the reason to use one vs the other may not only have to do with watertight seal and smooth transition from one pipe material to another, it may also have something to do with the ability of the sleeve to resist abuse from a mechanical snake sent down the drain the clear a blockage and that snake may be fitted with a spinning chain or a cutting head or whatever, may be a thicker rubber will also withstand physical abuse better.
Finally, when I repair or replace a section of pipe, whether PVC or cast, I measure the gap and cut a piece precisely in between. With a thick rubber sleeve, you can slide the sleeve off to one side, fit the pipe in between so there is no gap, then slide the two coupling back over. It is possible to do the transition with no gap at all if you cut the pipe end squarely and measure correctly. With a neoprene sleeve, there is a lip in the middle of the sleeve, so you cannot slide the sleeve over. The thin neoprene must be fitted onto one pipe first, then roll the other side back like rolling a sock, then once the pipes are aligned you roll that end over the other pipe. When you do it this way, it is much harder to do it with no gap, there is always a neoprene lip in the middle and some gap which I personally do not like.
Edited 3 times.
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
Lex (CA)
Thank you, sum. I appreciate your insight and the information. Really helpful!
Edited 1 times.
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
bsipps (PA)
Shear ring fernco and support it underneath with concrete
|
Post Reply
|
Please note:
- Inappropriate messages or blatant advertising will be deleted. We cannot be held responsible for bad or inadequate advice.
- Plbg.com has no control over external content that may be linked to from messages posted here. Please follow external links with caution.
- Plbg.com is strictly for the exchange of plumbing related advice and NOT to ask about pricing/costs, nor where to find a product (try Google), nor how to operate or promote a business, nor for ethics (law) and the like questions.
- Plbg.com is also not a place to ask radiant heating (try HeatingHelp.com), electrical or even general construction type questions. We are exclusively for plumbing questions.
Search for plumbing parts on our sponsor's site:
Special thanks to our sponsor:
![PlumbingSupply.com](https://www.plumbingsupply.com/images/plumbingsupply.png)
|