Over 700,000 strictly plumbing related posts
Welcome to Plbg.com (also known as PlumbingForum.com) where plumbing advice, education, information, help and suggestions are provided by some of the most experienced plumbers and plumbing contractors anywhere who all wish to "give back" to society. Since 1996 we have been free without popup or other invasive ads and known to be the best online STRICTLY PLUMBING advice site. If you have questions about plumbing, toilets, sinks, faucets, drains, sewers, water filters, venting, water heating, showers, pumps, and other strictly PLUMBING related issues then you've come to the right place. Please refrain from asking or discussing legal questions, or pricing, or where to find and/or purchase products, or any business issues, or for contractor referrals, or any other questions or issues not specifically related to plumbing. Keep all posts positive and absolutely no advertising. Our site is completely free, without ads or pop-ups and we don't track you. We absolutely do not sell your personal information. We are made possible by:
Author:
ScienceBuilder (OR)
My preferred tub/shower supply-line layout deviates from standard practice. My goal is to do everything "correctly", but I do not have the experience to know when deviating from standard practices is acceptable. So, I decided that I should ask the pros for advice!
Supplies:
1 Grohe Grotherm 1/2" Thermostatic Rough-in Valve (34 122)
2 Grohe 1/2" Volume Control Rough-in Valves (29 273)
1 Hand Shower on sliding bar (with vacuum breaker)
1 Drop Ell
1 NON-diverter tub spout
Desired layout:
shower head on bar
|
|
supplied from drop ell
|
|
supplied from_______
vol cntrl #1
|
|
thermostatic valve
|
|
vol cntrl #2
supplies
|
|
non-diverter tub spout
The Grohe information states that using both outlets on the thermostatic valve simultaneously can cause inconsistency in temperature. It suggests using one outlet and plugging the other. However, in this layout, would it be permissible to use the top outlet to feed the hand shower and the bottom outlet to feed the tub spout? Both outlets would never be used simultaneously. Alternatively, I would have to loop the supply lines to one or the other adding additional 90s.
I need to have a solution that works with these supplies/setup. Solutions which would require purchasing a diverter tub spout or a diverter valve have already been considered and are not preferred.
Thanks for any assistance!
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
Tom130 (IL)
You'll be fine. The only time that would be an issue would be if you had more than one outlet going at once i.e. a shower head and body sprays.
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
packy (MA)
since one outlet is for filling the tub while the other is for showering, i can't think of a reason to use both at once???
as tom says, use both outlets, you'll be fine
BTW, no fancy vacuum breaker needed on the spray hose. the grohe 34-122 has check valves built in.
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
ScienceBuilder (OR)
Thank you for your quick and helpful reply. What a relief! I have been agonizing over the layout. . .
Edited 1 times.
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
ScienceBuilder (OR)
Thank you also for your quick and helpful confirmation. Other than kids "investigating" I also can't think of any reason anyone would use both at once.
RE vacuum breaker: isn't it required on all hand showers on the hose- in case the head falls into a full tub and sucks "dirty water" back into the potable supply?
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
ScienceBuilder (OR)
or do the Grohe check valves meet this requirement?
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
packy (MA)
you will never get any back syphoning thru the grohe valve.
remember the grohe valve is turned on and set to 109 deg F. you never touch it. i believe there is a button to depress so you can get hotter water thru it. this will help getting a nice hot bath.
the volume controls are kept off. you only open whichever function you choose and close it when finished.
you chose a good quality product. the only downside is if the thermostatic cartridge needs replacement, they are expensive. keep the paperwork around because they are tricky to take apart if service is needed.
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
ScienceBuilder (OR)
Again, thanks for sharing your time and expertise. My Grandma taught me to save, buy quality, do it right, and do it once. Thanks for helping me do that. . . I'm sure I'll have more questions later on!
|
Post Reply
|
Please note:
- Inappropriate messages or blatant advertising will be deleted. We cannot be held responsible for bad or inadequate advice.
- Plbg.com has no control over external content that may be linked to from messages posted here. Please follow external links with caution.
- Plbg.com is strictly for the exchange of plumbing related advice and NOT to ask about pricing/costs, nor where to find a product (try Google), nor how to operate or promote a business, nor for ethics (law) and the like questions.
- Plbg.com is also not a place to ask radiant heating (try HeatingHelp.com), electrical or even general construction type questions. We are exclusively for plumbing questions.
Search for plumbing parts on our sponsor's site:
Special thanks to our sponsor:
|