Over 698,000 strictly plumbing related posts
Plumbing education, information, advice, help and suggestions are provided by some of the most experienced plumbers who wish to "give back" to society. Since 1996 we have been the best online (strictly) PLUMBING advice site. If you have questions about plumbing, toilets, sinks, faucets, drains, sewers, water filters, venting, water heating, showers, pumps, and other strictly PLUMBING related issues then you've come to the right place. Please refrain from asking or discussing legal questions, or pricing, or where to purchase products, or any business issues, or for contractor referrals, or any other questions or issues not specifically related to plumbing. Keep all posts positive and absolutely no advertising. Our site is completely free, without ads or pop-ups and we don't tract you. We absolutely do not sell your personal information. We are made possible by:
Author:
mik2 (WI)
I was trying to remove an old gas shut off valve and was having some trouble in a confined space. I backed up the 1/2" pipe with my channel locks but it spun as I tried to remove the valve. I loosened the next joint.... in the wall.
Inside the wall it was one side of a coupling that was loose. I was able to spin it off by hand. The other side didnt look like it turned, it certainly wasnt loose by hand like the other side so I didnt touch it further.
I remade the joint on the one the side of the coupling and soaped everything and it doesnt appear to be leaking.
My question...
If I turned the pipe in the one side of the coupling enough to be able to spin it off by hand, do you think I loosened the other side or any other downstream joint?
Edited 1 times.
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
hj (AZ)
If you had, IT would have come out of the wall.
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
mik2 (WI)
If you tried to remove iron pipe without backing it up, would the next joint downstream be the one most likely to loosen? Is it possible to loosen both sides of a fitting in this manner?
Im thinking there is only one pivot point if that makes sense.... once the one side is loose enough to spin off by hand its not possible to torque another joint downstream.
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
bernabeu (SC)
correct
==============================================
"Measure Twice & Cut Once" - Retired U.A. Local 1 & 638
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
mik2 (WI)
Thanks, heres some photos of the joints i was worried about. Does it appear to you like the joints are loose by the exposed thread count?
The joint with the fresh dope is the one that I accidentally loosened and then remade. It had newish dope on it from a previous owner which is why it probably loosened easily. The other joints have a very hard glue like dope and are much older... i didnt remake those.
Edited 2 times.
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
hj (AZ)
When you twist it, the "loosest" joint will turn first and none of the others will be affected.
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
sum (FL)
can't see the pictures. Fellow DIYer here.
Unless it is a straight run all the way, you are only concerned up till the first elbow. I would think most of the time, the more downstream from you it is, the more likely the pipe sections and fittings will resist being turned loose from strapping, or friction against holes in studs, or years of build up gunk or corrosion around the joints.
I would just make your two joints, then tighten them correctly. If during the tightening process, the pipes beyond those two joints does not turn at all, you should be safe. If they do turn, then may be they were loosened for some reason?
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
mik2 (WI)
Thanks for the replies...
Edited 1 times.
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
mik2 (WI)
Does the coupling look correct? I used 10" and 12" pair of channel locks... thrres 4 threads exposed.
No leaks with both bubbles and electronic sniffer. i hope my wrenches were large enough and my joint will have long term integrity.
The nipple had 11 threads and was approx 3/4" long.
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
hj (AZ)
The "exposed threads" have very little to do with whether it is tight enough or not. Did you tighten it as much as possible? If yes, AND, you had the proper tools, ( I seldom consider Channelocks "proper tools" for tightening steel pipes), then it should be leak proof.
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
mik2 (WI)
Being in a confined space, the channel locks were easiest for me to maneuver. I tightened as much as I could with 10" and 12"and used teflon based dope.
I understand its about whether it leaks or not instead of how many threads are showing but is 4 threads for a 1/2" pipe the standard or should I have them buried into the fitting?
does the use of channellocks make it questionable for the long term?
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
packy (MA)
if you pipe dope the male threads and screw in the nipple by hand you will get an idea of how loose or how tight the joint is. sometimes you get 2-3 full turns by hand and sometimes not. in any case, you have to remember that natural gas is only a few ounces of pressure so unless there is a pinhole in a fitting or you forget to make up a joint, leaks are really pretty rare.
when we test gas for an inspection we are only required to put 5 PSI on the system for the inspector. (MA code)
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
bernabeu (SC)
'Theoretically' for 1/2 & 3/4 NPT (IPS):
14 TPI
'cut' 3/4" long - 11 threads
into fitting 7 turns total = 4 threads showing = perfect make-up
trivia: all fittings 1/8 through 2" have EXACTLY 7 threads female threads = 'perfect' make-up = 7 turns total
tightening further merely wedges the fitting open on the last imperfect threads of the male breaking the tapered wedge seal made by the good threads
ps. my kaka don't stink and my joints don't leak - EVER
==============================================
"Measure Twice & Cut Once" - Retired U.A. Local 1 & 638
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
hj (AZ)
quote; my kaka don't stink and my joints don't leak - EVER
either both statements are true or they are both false.I will let the readers decide which based on the first one.
|
Post Reply
|
Author:
bernabeu (SC)
==============================================
"Measure Twice & Cut Once" - Retired U.A. Local 1 & 638
|
Post Reply
|
Please note:
- Inappropriate messages or blatant advertising will be deleted. We cannot be held responsible for bad or inadequate advice.
- Plbg.com has no control over external content that may be linked to from messages posted here. Please follow external links with caution.
- Plbg.com is strictly for the exchange of plumbing related advice and NOT to ask about pricing/costs, nor where to find a product (try Google), nor how to operate or promote a business, nor for ethics (law) and the like questions.
- Plbg.com is also not a place to ask radiant heating (try HeatingHelp.com), electrical or even general construction type questions. We are exclusively for plumbing questions.
Search for plumbing parts on our sponsor's site:
Special thanks to our sponsor:
|